The war on porn amuses me. (Hey, Mari posted about it, and Belle did, and Erosblog did, and Mistress Matisse is even linked on their site…what can I say, I had to pipe up with my 2 cents. *grin*)
Porn doesn’t harm my children - porn FEEDS my children! Since a good share of our household income comes from one of their parents working as a clerk in an adult store - without which income we’d be in rather dire straights - it amuses me to see websites where idiotic claims such as “Pornography is more addictive than alcohol, cigarettes or illicit drugs” are made with absolutely no substantiation. (And trust me, cigarettes are far more addictive than porn. If porn can even be said to be addictive in any similar way to the way that alcohol, cigarettes, or drugs are - which is bullshit, since those are physical addictions. Nobody ever had the DTs without their porn. Nobody ever died without their porn fix like a junkie without his heroin.)
Let’s check out some of that article’s other silly claims:
“Nine in 10 children ages 8 to 16 have viewed porn online - most of them by accident.”
I’m sure 90% of those under age 17 have viewed porn online - just as, thirty years ago, 90% of those under age 17 had viewed porn somewhere: their big brother’s Penthouse magazine, their best friend’s parents’ video collection when no adults were home, or (in my particular case *grin*) while snooping through the bookshelf at a house where they were babysitting. Sexually-explicit material has never been difficult for kids & teenagers to get ahold of, people. Quit being so fucking naive.
And, speaking of naive, do you think the kids who’ve admitted to seeing porn online are going to admit it wasn’t an accident?! With the technological sophistication of the average junior high schooler these days, I don’t believe for one second that “most” porn viewed by kids under 17 was “accidental.”
“The average age of first exposure to Web porn is 11.”
This statistic - again, unsubstantiated as to where it came from - tells me there are a lot of parents out there not supervising their kids’ online activities. (And ya gotta wonder, if they’re not supervising their kids online in their own homes, what about when the kids are actually out of the house?!) To the best of my knowledge, nobody has started a “war on bad parenting.” As one of my favorite sayings goes, “Gun control isn’t needed as much as parental control.”
“Nearly half of all children ages 11 to 17 with an Internet connection surf for porn sites.”
I bet that well over half of all 14- to 17-year-olds have indeed surfed for porn online (hi, you’re stupid if you think teens aren’t incredibly interested in sex - I “surfed for porn” in my public library when I was 14, and guess what? I found it, too), but I bet a lot less than half of the 11- to 13-year-olds have. Mark Twain once said there are 3 types of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics. Ya know what? You can make statistics say almost anything you want to by setting the parameters to meet your agenda, and it’s pretty obvious what the “war on porn” people’s agenda is: to scare parents into believing the idiotic idea that the adult industry targets children as victims, because these groups want to control what other adults can obtain - notably, sexually-explicit material that they don’t approve of!
And doesn’t this statistic rather contradict the earlier statement that “Nine in 10 children ages 8 to 16 have viewed porn online - most of them by accident.”? You can’t have it both ways - that most porn viewed by kids online is accidental and that nearly half of all kids have deliberately surfed for porn.
“One in 5 children ages 10 to 17 has received sexual solicitations while on the Internet.”
Guess what, geniuses? One in 5 children ages 10 to 17 has been sexually molested in real fucking life, and I don’t see a “war on pedophiles” getting a smidgen as much attention. And as for the theory that porn (whether child porn or not) causes pedophilia? Bullshit - the law of supply-and-demand shows that there wouldn’t be a supply if there wasn’t a demand. Besides, where do you think pedophiles came from back in the days of the Puritans? They most assuredly didn’t have a copious supply of child porn back then, but you can bet there were plenty of slimeballs molesting kids.
“Kids can bypass most blocking software with a single click of the mouse.”
You don’t say? Could that mean that your kids are more computer literate than you are? Could that mean that you’re being lazy parents who lack self-accountability if you trust software to do your job of supervising your kids’ activities? Could that mean that you’ve been suckered into spending a ton of money on software that’s essentially pointless? My heart bleeds for you.
I’m very fiercely protective of my 11- to 15-year-old daughters. I don’t think they’re in danger from porn. I think they’re in danger from professional busybodies who want to take their rights and freedoms and education away from them.